Archive for July, 2010

Tax Attorney reveals IRS mistakes are common during tax season

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

http://getirshelp.com Tax Attorney Darrin T. Mish reveals how the IRS can still make mistakes, even if you prepare your tax returns properly. Know what your options are when facing an unwarranted IRS audit.

Duration : 0:2:40

(more…)

 Mail this post

Examination Overview – IRS Audits, from the Taxpayer Advocate Service

Monday, July 26th, 2010

This message is from Nina Olson, the National Taxpayer Advocate and your voice at the IRS. It is one of a series of videos with consumer tax tips about important tax issues you may be facing. This series focuses on IRS audits, which are also called examinations. This video provides an examination overview.

The Taxpayer Advocate Service, an independent organization within the IRS, helps taxpayers resolve problems with the IRS and recommends changes that will prevent the problems.

For additional information, please visit http://www.irs.gov/advocate .

(This video is closed captioned.)

Duration : 0:5:57

(more…)

 Mail this post

What happens when a stock is taken off the market? How do you claim a loss? VOIP Inc?

Sunday, July 25th, 2010

A few years ago, I had some money invested in VOIP Inc (initially traded as VOII , then VOIC ) . It was about $500 initial investment, and became worth $0.01 and I have been holding on to it for a few years to save as a loss for tax purposes when I need it. This year I had some sales with a 50% gain so I figured I would sell the shares this year to cut back on the taxes I’ll have to pay for those profits.

However, when I tried to sell the stocks at sharebuilder.com, it says this "A security with the symbol VOIC is not recognized as a valid listed security. Use the Find Symbol option if you need help finding the symbol."

It still shows up in my portfolio as an open position, as VOIC . How am I going to be able to claim a loss if my broker is still calling it an "Open" position? It isn’t a realized loss until the position is closed.

It looks like the SEC revoked their registration on July 14, 2009. http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2009/34-60300.pdf

Yes – I know VOIP Inc was a bad investment – that’s a whole other story, so if you answer please stick to the topic of claiming a loss on a stock that had it’s registration revoked.

You need to sell it. Talk to your broker about how to do this. They may have a procedure for closing out positions like this.

Being removed from an exchange is meaningless for tax purposes because there was never any requirement that they be listed in the first place. They haven’t been doing SEC filings so they can’t be listed on an exchange, so, they’re trading in the pink sheets. As long as the company still exists and you have a position in it, then there is still a possibility of profit and you can’t claim the loss.

 Mail this post

How to Avoid an IRS Tax Audit : How to Report Business Losses on Schedule C Tax Form

Saturday, July 24th, 2010

You must establish profit motive to use the schedule C tax form. Learn how to report business losses on your Schedule C form to avoid a tax audit from the IRS in this free personal finance video from an experienced accountant.

Expert: Diana Crawford
Contact: www.cmccpas.com
Bio: Diana Crawford is a CPA with more than 20 years of public accounting experience. She is a graduate of Georgia State University with a bachelor’s degree in accounting.
Filmmaker: David Clarke

Duration : 0:1:46

(more…)

 Mail this post

IRS Audits

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

Recorded on April 17, 2010 using a Flip Video camcorder.

Duration : 0:2:25

(more…)

 Mail this post

finding the right lawyer?

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

I bought property at a property tax auction in washington state in 2005. I put it up for sale and we have potential buyers.The buyer checked in on the property and found out that there is a litigation lean from some lawyer in 2001 and leans proir to us purchasing the property from some maintenance company witch shoudl have been cleared up before the tax auction sold the property.When we bought the property we were told that the purchase price was for all debts from past owner.The prior owner is dead.We never new anything about this until we put it up for sale.We called the treasury Dept and got the run around saying that none of the leans can be removed.We have been paying on the property and now the property is worthless we can’t sell it or do anything with it.Can someone direct me to what to do. and what kind of lawyer I need to help clear this up.

If you need an aggressive lawyer see http://locate-power-of-attorney.info
check out their FAQ to understand how they operate :)

 Mail this post

Are photocopies of receipts for write offs acceptable if the IRS audits you? (In person, not via mail).?

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

I am an independent contractor & often purchase items for jobs with my own money when my boss forgets to give me petty cash. At the end of the job, my boss buys the original receipts off of me to include with their final bill. Should that expense reimbursement be included on my 1099 if I only have a photocopy of the receipt & not the original? How can I write off the same receipt my boss is writing off?
Let me clarify – if I spend $100 on snacks for the crew (I work on film shoots), and am paid a fee of $300, plus reimbursed that $100 – my employer should only make my 1099 state $300, not $400, correct?
I am arguing this point with a client now. She claims that she would make my 1099 $400 – not $300, and it is up to me to report my actual income less expenses to the IRS as $300. She claims that if I keep a photocopy of that reimbursed $100 receipt, and I get audited, it will prove I do not owe taxes on that reimbursed expense.
I disagree because in the end, the person receiving the final bill including my fees, expenses, and the rest of the crew’s fees gets to write off that expense – they have "bought" it off of me.
If this client of mine sends me a 1099 that includes a reimbursed petty cash expense, do I need to tell the IRS the client refuses to send an accurate 1099, or is the client doing things properly?
Does this make more sense?
I just found this link to a very helpful book that backs up what I thought, and what these other contributors say:
http://books.google.com/books?id=buY06oJJ3D4C&pg=PA141&lpg=PA141&dq=reimbursed+expenses+on+1099&source=bl&ots=N_gffVWYr4&sig=X-Np_ItVR3IS8-8lkZWH8gFwrk8&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=4&ct=result#PPA143,M1

Dear Lots: Sounds like you got some good advice and I agree, she’s wrong. If all else fails consider Form 4598 it’s an official IRS complaint form. That will certainly get your employers attention.

This advice was prepared based on our understanding of the tax law in effect at the time it was written as it applies to the facts that you provide. Click on my profile to read more.
Errol Quinn Enrolled Agent Master Tax Advisor

 Mail this post

How did Madoff go on cheating, stealing and embezzling so long without detection? Read on and see?

Monday, July 19th, 2010

Here is Madoff’s strategy:
1. He enticed charities, which are organizations, who would be less hostile if he were exposed, unlike individual investors who lost their all in all, who would be outraged to violence. To fortify his concealed fraud and theft, he got into the directorate of the particular charity, or one of his family did, so that if anything was brought up, he’d get ear of it and either silence it or cover it up specially.
2. He screened CAREFULLY every individual investor-to-be, for several purposes: (when I mean "SCREENING CAREFULLY" for these purpose he did extensive, and in depth checks of credit, family members and family backgrounds, court litigation records and even surveillances of activities of persons who wanted to invest with him, before accepting or rejecting their requests to invest. The purpose:
a. To create the appearance of exclusivity and class, so that whatever invester was accepted, would be grateful and less likely to look deep down and question what was going on.
b. To investigate the specific investor –
b. The reason he hired investigators to go into every detail of the potential investor’s business activity, credit background, marital involvements etc and if there were indications of tax fraud or divorce fraud, he’d take them in as investors to see if his financial activities were such that the money he was giving to Madoff was concealed tax fraud, or illegally obtained unreported income that plenty of monied people have, and who seek places where the monies can remain concealed in a larger fund composed of many investors. In applications to invest, Madoff asked where the funds the potential investor wanted to turn over to Madoff were situated at the time of the request, Madoff knew that if the fraud ever was found out, these investors with shady assets that the IRS would immediately check into if their names were brought up in any claims against Madoff, that these people would just go away and take their loss rather than face criminal or civil charges by the IRS or federal prosecutors. So Madoff rejected investors who had clean backgrounds but for those with questionable sources or sites of present wealth, he had a ready made gag over the mouths of many, many individual investors who he ripped off, knowing they would never open their mouths to regulators if his schemes were exposed.
crooks never get away with it. sooner or later their guise cracks, usually from a disgruntled insider who blows a whistle. Madoff knew the scheme was about to fall apart so he had his sons pretend to be whistle blowers so they wouldnt be charged with crimes and go down with him (fatherly love)
1 day ago

the support will show when the lists of claims doesnt match the amount missing. Then regulators will have to go into the day by day activity that can unearth to provide you with your demand for proof. Just be patient,. Only the tip of the iceberg is seen now

You also forgot to mention that he setup a shell accounting firm that had only one client, Madoff.

 Mail this post

Tax Lawyers in New York & New Jersey

Sunday, July 18th, 2010

Levy, Ehrlich & Petriello
http://www.newark-lawyers.com

At the law firm of Levy, Ehrlich & Petriello, we have tax attorneys who apply their tax knowledge to all areas of the law, including estate planning, business and commercial law, construction law, real estate, and divorce. Our tax clients include corporations, partnerships, limited liability companies , individuals, trusts and other entities.

At Levy, Ehrlich & Petriello, we are equipped with the experience and the skill to advise clients in any area of federal tax law. With an in-depth knowledge of New Jersey and New York law, we also work extensively in the area of state and local tax matters.

Levy, Ehrlich & Petriello
http://www.newark-lawyers.com
E-mail: info@lep-lawyers.com

Newark, New Jersey Law Office
60 Park Place, Suite 1016
Newark, New Jersey 07102-5504
Phone: 973-643-0040
Fax: 973-596-1781

New York City Law Office
555 5th Avenue, 14th Floor
New York, New York 10017
Phone: 212-643-2503

Duration : 0:1:28

(more…)

 Mail this post

Obama threatens Tax Audits

Thursday, July 15th, 2010

At the ASU commencement President Obama joked about using tax audits to punish those at ASU who had voted against giving him an honorary degree. Even as a joke this is offensive.

“Paul Caron, a professor at the University of Cincinnati who writes the taxprof blog, noted in response to Obama’s remarks that the law calls for the termination of IRS employees who make Audit threats for illegitimate reasons. He suggested that Mr. Obama’s “joke” might be grounds for firing if he were an IRS employee.”
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124260113149028331.html

For a President who has threatened and intimidated banks into accepting his stimulus funds, and who has threatened a hedge fund into accepting his Chrysler solution or face negative press., using the IRS to undermine those who stand against him is not outside the realm of possibility.

Duration : 0:0:59

(more…)

 Mail this post